Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 201 - 220 of 413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Plaintiffs’ damage expert then developed comprehensive damage exposure models according to the theories of liability and the available damages under the substantive law in each case (e.g., wage deductions, deceptive trade practices, rescission, and unjust enrichment). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Unpaid undertakers go on a rampage like the Night of the Living Dead and want to embalm their employers in this CAFA case. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:07 am by John Elwood
The case presents two questions. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:27 am by Rachel E. Burke
Additionally, it reminds employers that employment decisions should be measured and well-supported by a reasonable investigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:54 pm by Ohio Employment Law Letter
” In a “sex-plus” case, like this one, in which the court finds the employee established a sufficient foundation of discrimination, the employer is not permitted to “undermine her prima facie case by showing that white women and African[-]American men received the same treatment. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  For this purpose, Code Section 4376(b)(2) defines a plan sponsor as: The employer in the case of a plan established or maintained by a single employer; The employee organization in the case of a plan established or maintained by an employee organization; The association, committee, joint board of trustees, or other similar group of representatives of the parties who establish or maintain the plan in the case of: (1) a plan established or… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
Now we call it "The BARF Act").Here's the way the stay is terminated by a creditor, which happens most frequently when the bank just can't wait to finish the trustee's sale in Arizona, and a bankruptcy is filed which stymies the bank in its evil quest. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
While it is certainly true that commuters receive the benefit of some state services in their employer’s state, they typically benefit far more from services where they live. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 8:23 am by Hirsch & Lyon
  In the commercial context, a number of state and federal regulations govern inspections — failure to adhere to these rules may expose the driver and their employer to significant liability. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 10:39 am by John Bisnar
In this particular case, if the boat operator is determined to have been negligent he and his employer (if there is one) can be held liable for the damages and losses caused. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am by Erin Miller
Title: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Arizona alleges that California has been applying its “doing-business tax” to Arizona-based limited liability corporations based solely on their passive investment in California corporations or LLCs, and that such application violates the due process clause. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 11:46 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
But the Arizona court found that since the officer was only on the scene because of his employment, any injury he sustained, even if it occurred while going above-and-beyond the call of duty, was covered by the assumption of risk. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:45 pm by Sheppard Mullin
” She then used the FCA action to persuade the Arizona court to vacate the TRO and stay General Dynamics’ lawsuit. [read post]