Search for: "Arizona Employers' Liability Cases" Results 241 - 260 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 10:38 am by Jason Shinn
Chamber Institute for Legal Reform found that in 2006-08 companies at the low end of the range were paying $620,000 per case, and those at the high end were paying almost $3 million per case in discovery costs. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:16 am by Jon Gelman
Industrial Commission of Arizona, No. 1 CA-IC 12-0038 held that the North American Free Trade Agreement did not pre-empt Arizona's workers' compensation statutes and that Porteadores del Noroeste could face liability in Arizona for the additional compensation that one of its workers, Adan Valenzuela, claimed he was due.Valenzuela worked for Porteadores as a driver,... [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
Miguel Millan Ramirez and additional compensation.In September 2010, Valenzuela filed an injury report with the Industrial Commission of Arizona naming Porteadores as his employer. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:56 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
This lawsuit illustrates that the department will use every enforcement tool necessary to resolve cases where employees are unlawfully treated as independent contractors, and vulnerable workers are not paid the minimum wage. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:48 pm by Colin O'Keefe
CPSC Regulatory Issues Often Impact Product Liability – Real estate litigator William Ruskin of EpsteinBeckerGreen on his Toxic Tort Litigation Blog Before Trying to Avoid the Employer Mandate, Beware of Liability Under the ACA and ERISA – Steve Peltin and Emily Kelly of Foster Pepper Washington Workplace Law The Jameis Winston Case: Not Your Classic “He Said, She Said” – Adrienne Grubic and Jeffrey S. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:06 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff amended his complaint, raising a new claim for vicarious liability against the defendant's employer, under the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:14 pm by Dorsey
  The Ross Court reasoned that California’s Compassionate Use Act (Proposition 215) was intended to protect physicians and users from criminal liability, and was not intended to apply in the employment context. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Brian Hall
I had also noted that at least one other such case had been filed in federal court in Arizona. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:58 am by Joe Consumer
Especially hurt will be plaintiff-victims in fact-intensive cases like civil rights and employment discrimination, as well as cases involving product liability, bank fraud, environmental violations, and other complex cases like anti-trust, where evidence vital to proving the case is often in the sole possession of the wrongdoer(s). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:34 pm by Michael Lowe
For more on the intricacies of mortgage fraud, check out our web page discussing mortgage fraud or read Michael Lowe’s case result in a Dallas mortgage fraud case “LESS THAN ONE HALF GUIDELINE SENTENCE ON DALLAS FEDERAL MORTGAGE FRAUD CASE” as an example of defending against these charges. 1. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 am by Susan Schneider
  We have fifteen candidates in total, with three special candidates attending part-time to allow for their full-time employment. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 12:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
   Because states all have their own wage and hour laws, employers may face liability under either or both laws. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 9:12 am by Steve Matthews
Texas product liability firm Hissey Kientz LLP has been busy this month! [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 7:12 am by David DePaolo
It was clear to me that this was a case of significant liability and I was able to settle the case THAT day by calling the adjuster and securing $70,000 for a compromise and release. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:32 pm by Robert B. Milligan
They also provide a wider variety of remedies than contract claims, exposing defendants to liability for all harm proximately caused by the defendants’ conduct. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm by Cicely Wilson
An employee is a “supervisor” for purposes of vicarious liability under Title VII only if empowered by the employer to take tangible employment actions against the victim. [read post]