Search for: "Armstrong v. Armstrong" Results 221 - 240 of 996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Doug Cornelius
[More…] BATTLE OF THE SOMME WEEK – PART V: WHAT DID IT ALL MEAN? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:12 am
This vignette takes place after the oral argument in the Watergate tapes case (United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:39 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Toronto’s Mayor Rampages on, to City’s Shame - NY Times Arora v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:33 am by Docket Navigator
Internet Patents Corporation v. eBags, Inc. et al, 4-12-cv-03385 (CAND August 28, 2013, Order) (Armstrong, J.). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
"... by imposing mandatory private enforcement — a limitation unheard — of with regard to state legislatures," wrote Justice Scalia in an opinion called Armstrong v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Walter (Omar) gets the first line "The victim's name is Kirk Armstrong. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:01 am
However, as the Court of Appeals indicated in Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6, a collective bargaining agreement may provide for alternatives to the statutory provisions provided such modifications are consistent with administrative due process.The full text of the Commissioners decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.counsel.nysed.gov] [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:09 am
All other charges are to be heard by a single hearing officer.** As the Court of Appeals indicated in Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6, a collective bargaining agreement may provide for alternatives to the statutory provisions provided such modifications are consistent with administrative due process.The full text of the Commissioners decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.counsel.nysed.gov/Decisions/volume48/d15850.htm [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
However, as the Court of Appeals indicated in Antinore v State, 40 NY2d 6, a collective bargaining agreement may provide for alternatives to the statutory provisions provided such modifications are consistent with administrative due process.The full text of the Commissioners decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.counsel.nysed.gov] [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:32 pm by William Baude
Tomorrow the Court will hear arguments in Armstrong v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am by William Baude
The Supreme Court has heard a lot of preemption suits, but Tuesday’s arguments in Armstrong v. [read post]