Search for: "Arthur v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
 Andersen announced in June 2002 that it would cease its accounting practices in the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
For reasons that I am too lazy to look up, the decision that the Supreme Court overturned is not from a Circuit Court of Appeals but from a panel of one judge from the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and two from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. [read post]
24 May 2009, 6:07 am
See here for more details.This week at the CCAs: On Thursday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:39 am by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from State of NEW JERSEY, Department of Treasury, Division of Investment, o/b/o Common Pension Fund A v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:15 pm by Tom Withers
Jordan “engaged in criminal conduct . . . on nine separate occasions, [and] used a counterfeit badge and his United States Marshal credentials to pose as an on-duty U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Schwab of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a post-Koken decision in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The result of the CAFC case Solvay (represented by ARTHUR I. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Supreme Court decided Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT'---~F;:U'l";;ED;::---U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Schwab of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a post-Koken decision in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]