Search for: "Asbestos Litigation v. Owens Corning" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
$730 million Bell Asbestos Mines $635 million Federal Mogul Corporation T&N Subfund $635 million AC$S $528 million General Motors $625 million Honeywell Heating $452 million Garlock $480 million Gold Bond $347 million National Gypsum $347 million Abex Corporation $307 million Owens Corning Fibreboard, Owens Corning Subfund $3.4 billion The… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:40 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 84 Ohio App.3d 388, 616 N.E.2d 1162 (1992). [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. , 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947, 949 (1987)) 10 Id. at 7. 11 Dale v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 84 Ohio App.3d 388, 616, N.E.2d 1162 (1992), which had held that pleural thickening or "plaques" were sufficient to constitute an injury, for purposes of stating a personal injury cause of action under Ohio law. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Owens Corning Corp., 964 F.2d 92 (2d Cir. 1992) Maiorana v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., 1986 WL 69060, at *5-6 (N.D. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 8:13 am by Schachtman
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 576 N.E.2d 28, 30, 215 Ill. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
During his years of employment, Owens-Corning had used both chrysotile and amosite in manufacturing Kaylo. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 Examples are not driving a riding lawnmower parallel to a slope (because you’ll tip over) or only handling asbestos while using a respirator (because breathing asbestos can do nasty things to you). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 247 (1984), rev’d on other grounds, 816 F.2d 1417 (10th Cir. 1987) In re TMI Litig., 927 F. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
In both cases, plaintiffs’ expert witnesses committed to opinions about plaintiffs’ being at risk from asbestos exposure, based upon studies that they identified. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987 (1991), held, "[i]t is only reasonable therefore that as between the injured user and the one who places the product on the market the latter should bear the loss. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]