Search for: "Ash v. Texas"
Results 41 - 60
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
US-based lawyer Stephen J Easley recently reported on a session at the South by Southwest Interactive Festival panel in Texas, “Can You Tweet That? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
Texas is of interest (and of course so is Ashe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:56 pm
[c]ash paid to Ramos" in the amount of "$91,201 (subject to Eva Ramos release). [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:28 am
" Janvey v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Ashe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
This is certainly an odd week to be hosting the MLK Day edition of Blawg Review and almost all of it has to do with the events in Arizona, late last week. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
Indeed, a patent to refine potash into pearl ash, which is basically pure potassium carbonate, was patent no. 1 (now X1) issued by the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:51 am
In the years 2004 and 2005, IPBiz covered the Clyde Bryant v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
[Post by Venkat] Buckles v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
HALL of Texas, Ms. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:24 am
Motors Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
