Search for: "Ashburn v. Ashburn" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Here, the Court did not find that the pattern of 911 and 311 calls by the Dawsons, the promises to put the family on the "Special Attention List", or suggestions that the family move or be placed in a protective status created such a special relationship, under either the first or second prongs of the Ashburn test. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Charles Sartain
No, said a Texas court in Enerquest Oil & Gas, LLC v. [read post]