Search for: "Austin v. Luther" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2009, 5:31 pm
(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images) The big news out of One First St., NE today: the Supreme Court decided to review a case called Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:52 pm
(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images) Last month, we blogged on a case that the Supreme Court recently agreed to hear: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm by BH
We saw him in Austin this past Spring and it still stands out as one of the best concerts I've ever seen. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am by Lowell Brown
Martin Luther King Jr. to a “long list of starring and supporting players” inside and outside Washington. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Joshua Thompson
  Today, as reported by the Northwest Austin Court, “[v]oter turnout and registration rates … approach parity. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
Ginsburg concludes with a reference to Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm by Don Cruse
Other coverage: “Exxon wins, again, in oil field sabotage case” (Austin American-Statesman) The medical-malpractice statute covers factually-related tort claims, even if alleging generic negligence Roy Kenji Yamada, M.D. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:48 am by Amy Starnes
(Subscription required) — Texas Lawyer The lawyer’s role in protecting cybersecurity in the courts — Houston-based attorney Rachel V. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]