Search for: "Automation Systems v. Standard Automation"
Results 21 - 40
of 567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
See Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:29 pm
ENCO Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
Where’s the safety in this system? [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm
” This case has significant precedential impact, setting a troubling standard allowing police to keep these records and details of its surveillance of ordinary, law-abiding citizens from ever being scrutinized. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:22 am
(Oracle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:30 pm
Circuit reviewed in ACA International v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 2:15 am
As TrustInIP describes, the Commission is responding to the probability that automated and connected vehicles will generate a large amount of data, that may be used in car-related services such as roadside assistance, vehicle insurance, vehicle repair and car rental.ContractsIP Draughts considers the issue of how to make an exclusion clause in standard contract terms legally enforceable, following the recent UK Court of Appeal case Goodlife Foods Ltd v Hall Fire… [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 7:06 am
” The Respondent in Carol House Furniture, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
It's basically an automated system that listens for gunshots and sends out a notification to police once it hears them.The Court of Appeal holds that in this case, the trial court should have conducted a Kelly/Frye hearing to determine whether the Shotspotter technology was scientifically reliable. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
The Court held that it was lawful for the police to use automated facial recognition software (“AFR”). [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:26 pm
., D/B/A Rently v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 11:55 am
Circuit heard oral argument in ACA International v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm
The Principle: Regulating Content Moderation Systems, Not Punishing Failures on a Case-by-Case Basis The “systemic duty of care” is a legal standard for assessing a platform’s overall system for handling harmful online content. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
C.M., 2012 ABPC 139 (paras. 49-53); Siemens Canada Limited v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
C.M., 2012 ABPC 139 (paras. 49-53); Siemens Canada Limited v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:24 am
Finally, a reminder that regulators routinely prefer human content moderation over automated systems, despite the potential toll that imposes on the content reviewers. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:36 am
December 8, 2021 - 1 PM: Eazy-PZ LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 2:23 pm
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:35 pm
Id. at 277 (4), 779 S.E.2d 474, citing Automated Drawing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
