Search for: "Aycock v. Aycock" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
& Rehab., 123 USPQ2d at 1029 (“mere preparation and publication of future plans do not constitute use in commerce”); Aycock Eng’g, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
” The bill also calls for the removal of the statues of white supremacists Charles Aycock, John Calhoun, and James Clarke. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Cir. 2015) (single page website offering more information about services not yet provided does not meet the use in commerce requirement); Aycock Eng’g, Inc. .v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
” The Federal Circuit cited its 2009 Aycock Eng’g Inc. v Airflite, Inc. ruling, which explained the use requirement for a service mark. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Although the court dismissed both counts, it dismissed the defamation claim without prejudice (Swindol v Aurora Flight Sciences Corp, September 30, 2014, Aycock, S). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:58 am by Alfred Brophy
 I suppose I need to add here that while this was completely unintentional on his part, Justice Thomas Ruffin was one of the most important people in our country in bringing about an end to slavery -- because his 1830 opinion in State v. [read post]