Search for: "Aycock v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
I suppose I need to add here that while this was completely unintentional on his part, Justice Thomas Ruffin was one of the most important people in our country in bringing about an end to slavery -- because his 1830 opinion in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Aycock Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:50 am
In Martin v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
In Aycock v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:15 pm
§ 1127; Aycock Eng’g, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
Aycock et al. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:38 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
” The Federal Circuit cited its 2009 Aycock Eng’g Inc. v Airflite, Inc. ruling, which explained the use requirement for a service mark. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 am
” Aycock, 90 USPQ2d at 1308; see also Lyons v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:44 pm
” Aycock Engineering, Inc., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:05 pm
CARL V. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
& Rehab., 123 USPQ2d at 1029 (“mere preparation and publication of future plans do not constitute use in commerce”); Aycock Eng’g, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Cir. 2015) (single page website offering more information about services not yet provided does not meet the use in commerce requirement); Aycock Eng’g, Inc. .v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm
To justify the removal of Taney’s bust, the bill declares that: While sitting in the United States Capitol, the Supreme Court issued the infamous Dred Scott v Sanford decision on March 6, 1857. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm
” A federal district court in Mississippi discussed this shift in the law (Lowe v American Eurocopter, LLC, 2010, Aycock, S.). [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 8:36 am
"]February 15, 2007 - 2 PM: Airflite, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:38 pm
Cir. 2015); Aycock Eng’g, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:16 pm
See Aycock Engineering Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:04 am
In Cooper Tire v. [read post]
