Search for: "B. Archibald"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
District Court Judge William B. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
Rosenstein in theory could, under 28 CFR 600.7(b), order Mueller not to pursue “any investigative or prosecutorial step,” but only if Rosenstein concluded, after giving Mueller’s views “great weight,” that Mueller’s proposed step was “inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Defense Attorneys: John Archibald Dusenbury, Jr. and Louis C. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
BUNTON, III, and ARCHIBALD HOVANESIAN, JR., Appellees. 1st District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Pleading -- Verification -- Appeals -- Certiorari -- Petition seeking review of non-final order denying without prejudice plaintiff's motion to amend complaint to add a count to reestablish lost promissory note on ground that verification of amended complaint was insufficient because it was based on “knowledge and belief” -- Trial court departed from essential requirements of the law… [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:50 pm
A statue of women’s rights pioneers Sojourner Truth, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. [read post]
18 May 2014, 7:51 pm
""Practically all of it in B. and O. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
Legal positivists believe (a) Justice and injustice are dependent on positive law; (b) Law itself is independent of justice; (c) Justice consists in conformity to positive law; (d) Justice, apart from legality, is merely a subjective [individual] norm; (e) Justice is obligatory ultimately only because of legal and political sanctions; and (f) The virtue of justice is identical with obedience. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Solo-Gabriele, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, University of Miami; Joseph B. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
In Part I of this series, I concluded that the “president cannot obstruct justice when he exercises his lawful authority that is vested by Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
They resigned because the President insisted that they fire prosecutor Archibald Cox when Cox subpoened Nixon's tapes. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
On July 30, 1974, President Nixon released the White House tape recordings to comply with a U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
After all, Nixon had fired their boss, the initial Special Prosecutor, Archibald Cox. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Resetting the Regulatory Context: From Command to Lineamientos 542 B. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
As Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor in the Watergate investigation who was fired during the Saturday Night Massacre, predicted, “[i]f the Executive Branch were left to itself, the practice [of executive privilege] would surely grow. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
For example, some of the more noteworthy books by Justices concern the Civil War, such as the following: Salmon Portland Chase, How the South Rejected Compromise in the Peace Conference of 1861 (1863) John Archibald Campbell, Reminiscences and Documents Relating to the Civil War During the Year 1865 (1887) William O. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
No. 80 Sec. 3(B)(1) (“In enacting section 2305.131 of the Revised Code in this act, it is the intent of the General Assembly . . . [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:00 pm
Editor’s Note: The following article should be read in conversation with “Is the Justice Department Meeting the Moment? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
In 1974, Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor in the Watergate scandal and the victim of the 1973 Saturday Night Massacre, wrote that “[i]f the Executive Branch were left to itself, the practice [of executive privilege] would surely grow” because “[s]ecrecy, if sanctified by a plausible claim of constitutional privilege, is the easiest solution to a variety of problems. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
One of the courses I enjoyed most was Archibald Cox’s course on the Supreme Court and the Constitution. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
Read a full transcript of our recent podcast debate between Alan Dershowitz and Laura Donohue about presidential power and the obstruction of justice, hosted by National Constitution Center president and CEO Jeffrey Rosen. [read post]
