Search for: "BARTON v. DISTRICT COURT" Results 81 - 100 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by David Doniger
EPA took these actions in response to the Supreme Court’s landmark 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm by WSLL
CiteID=465082 Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, The Honorable Michael N. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am by William A. Ruskin
 Because CERCLA bars claims for contribution/indemnification following a settlement of CERCLA liability, the federal district court granted THC’s motion for summary judgment, stating that THC had paid for its peace. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Paul Levy
by Paul Alan Levy This week the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an excellent decision rejecting a series of bogus trademark claims and hence a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by Ascentive, a software maker, against Opinion Corp., whose PissedConsumer web site provides a forum for consumers to post complaints (or praise). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
The defendant died during the pendency of the case, however, and the district court declined to instruct the jury on punitive damages against his estate. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Primary Discussants: Barton Beebe Bone’s work on the historical development of the multifactor test is very helpful. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am by RT
(Though I think all these were reversed/dissents—V’s Secret dissent, Charbucks district court; Beebe says Nikepal required a showing of effect on distinctiveness, but it didn’t seem to matter.) [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The disability had been based on a 1991 misdemeanor marijuana conviction, and the court ruled that disqualifying the defendant from owning a gun on that basis violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense, under the Supreme Court decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]