Search for: "BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC. v. EUROCOPTER" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The Federal Court of Appeal recently dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal (Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited, 2016 FC 590, the court clarified that this limit applied across bifurcated proceedings. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée, 2012 FC 113 citing Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2007 FC 971, the Court said it is entitled to look at all the patents and other publications that a skilled technician would discover in a ‘reasonable and diligent search’ to determine whether the resulting ‘mosaic’ leads directly to the invention. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions… [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Entitlement to punitive damages may be either in the first phase or the second phase (see Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]