Search for: "BLACK v. BELL" Results 1 - 20 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Bell was his worst decision. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:41 am by Alex Phipps
The court explained that normally, an appeal removes the jurisdiction of the trial court, but there is an exception under Bell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November 2023, the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the claimant’s defamation claim in Lee v Black, 2023 BCSC 1920 as being without any basis in fact. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm by centerforartlaw
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bell (Court upholds mandatory sterilization of persons deemed "feeble minded").6. [read post]