Search for: "BLACKBURN v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm by Jeffrey Mitchell
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by Liisa Speaker
Citing Mayor of Cadillac v Blackburn, 306 Mich App 512, 522; 857 NW2d 529 (2014), the Court of Appeals concluded that because relevant statutes do not state which standard of evidence a Probate Court should require for the removal of a guardian, the default standard of a preponderance of the evidence should be applied. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm by Sme
Estate of Morris Blackburn (10th Cir., May 23, 2017) (affirming Black Lung Benefits compensation claim and denying petition for review: the Labor Benefits Review Board did not err in affirming the award below)*Hays v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the directive, which lasted for a single weekend, did not create a racially hostile work environment so the dismissal of the employees’ HWE claim was affirmed (Blackburn v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
It is posted on the Internet at http://www.jcope.ny.gov/advice/ethc/98-12.htmIn Pagan v Commissioner of Labor, 53 AD3d 964, the Appellate Division addressed the disqualification of an applicant for unemployment insurance benefits following his termination for accepting a designation to run as a candidate for the State Assembly, ruling that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade discusses in the Guardian how the press attacked Dame Janet for failing to hold senior corporation managers to account and questions the wisdom of sacking Tony Blackburn. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 11:47 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
For more on this case, see also Blackburn v. [read post]