Search for: "BROOKS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
In two recent decisions, the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Seventh Circuit each split with the Second Circuit’s 2010 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:12 pm
In Brooks v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:25 am
The NLRB lacked a quorum of board members when it published its rule amending its representation election procedures on December 16, 2011, and the challenged rule is therefore invalid, the District of Columbia federal district court held, in a perhaps tepid — and temporary — victory for opponents of what has been dubbed the board’s “quickie” or “ambush” election rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, May… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit presents the second program in its series of Judge Patricia M. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 pm
 Fresh from his victory in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
ABC School District, Petitioner v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:00 am
District Court Judge Gregory H. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:56 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia observed that “if there is one thing this hearing has shown it's that this is not an easy case. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:24 am
This, as Rowles J.A. noted, “risks perpetuating the very disadvantage and exclusion from mainstream society theCode is intended to remedy” (see Brooks v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:41 pm
Dec. 26, 2013).Issues[1] Sidense first faults the district court for its reliance on our decision in MarcTec, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Further, the Court in Brooks Furniture based its reading on the Supreme Court's decision in Professional Real Estate Investors v Columbia Pictures Industries (1993), but Judge Rader considered that the Supreme Court's decision did not alter the traditional fee-shifting rule. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
" Last month, a federal district court in the District of Columbia upheld the notice-posting requirement, finding no evidence that Congress intended to preclude the board from promulgating such a rule. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am
SpainGoogle v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
Many either do not know or have forgotten that two Delaware cases were consolidated with those from three other states and the District of Columbia under the umbrella of Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Wald, former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
District of Columbia, #15-7062, 2016 U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 10:08 pm
Columbia Pictures, 508 U.S. 49 (1993). [read post]
