Search for: "BROWN v. KERR et al"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
Bus et al. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
The obvious drawback of this “preposterous” position (Lord Brown [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
The House of Lords did not pursue this interpretation in Knowsley, largely because Counsel for all parties (including Jan Luba QC) submitted that the then Housing and Regeneration Act would remedy this issue via the replacement tenancy, and in view of the may thousands of cases that had already been based on Thompson et al. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
