Search for: "BRUCE v. BRUCE" Results 21 - 40 of 3,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Bruce Ackerman, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic (2010). 72. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
In 2022, after US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart unsealed the search warrant and other documents in the Florida case against former president Donald Trump over his handling of classified documents at his home Mar-a-Lago, Reinhart faced a barrage of violent and anti-semitic threats. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm by Kalvis Golde
Bruce Sands has been serving an 11-year sentence for fraud and money laundering at Lompoc since 2016. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by Marty Lederman
Below are links to the complete series of my posts on Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Anderson: Marty Lederman’s Fundamental Mistake of Law Bruce Ackerman I have learned a lot from Marty Lederman over the years, so I was surprised to find that Part 1 of his “User’s Guide to Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Network Ten has told the Federal Court that Bruce Lehrmann acted “audaciously” in bringing his defamation suit against the broadcaster and gave “no remotely credible account” of the night his former colleague Brittany Higgins has alleged he raped her in Parliament House. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: Privacy cases about the privacy torts also do so. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: if it’s an indirect infringement claim, does it change the analysis? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:55 am by Rick Hasen
Here is the abstract: This Essay analyzes Pico Neighborhood Association v. [read post]
” The legislature initially passed HB 1466 in 2007 as a “trigger” ban intended to limit abortion services if the US Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]