Search for: "BYRNES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) to provide funding support for state and local law enforcement, the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
In addition, the Byrne Justice Assistance Grants program, which support a wide range of law enforcement activities and help local law enforcement partner with state and federal agencies, would be eliminated. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:02 pm
As… Justice Antonin Scalia explained in Printz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
Last year, Attorney General Jeff Sessions sought to cut Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant funds to state and local governments that fail to meet three conditions: 1. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Moreover, the US Department of State Human Rights Report for Uganda cites examples to unlawful killings and torture, and other abuses of detainees and suspects. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:21 am
Finally, the Solicitor General appears as an amicus on behalf of the bank, representing the Office of the United States Trustee (a component of the Department of Justice). [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:39 am
" The Sessions policy imposes three conditions on state and local governments receiving federal Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistant Grant funds: 1. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 11:33 am
Department of Justice, an important sanctuary cities case brought by several state governments, led by New York, and by New York City. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 pm
The principles of federal preemption are rooted in the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 6:48 pm
A Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering and Tracking (SMART) Office is established in the Department of Justice to administer standards for sex offender registration, grant programs and assistance to states. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
United States The privacy claim brought by wrestler Hulk Hogan against the “Gawker” gossip website arising out of the publication of a sex tape is due to commence in a Florida Court on 6 July 2015. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University's School of Justice Studies. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Many obituaries will focus on her prodigious and inspiring career in the United States: her journey, from a working-class upbringing in a single-parent family, to practice as a lawyer on child rights and in the Department of Justice, to service, in the District of Columbia Circuit, as the 1st woman Chief Judge of a U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Senators: Trump applied ‘persistent’ pressure to get Justice to discredit election MSN – Ann Marimow and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 8/12/2021 Former President Trump’s last attorney general told U.S. senators his boss was “persistent” in trying to pressure the Justice Department to discredit the results of the 2020 election. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Nothing in the record on appeal permits this Court to depart from the assumption that juries generally follow explicit instructions: see R. v. [read post]
