Search for: "Back v. Sebelius"
Results 1 - 20
of 320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 11:43 pm
Sebelius. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm
Obamacare is back at the Supreme Court, again. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:49 am
The Haro v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:44 am
Haro v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 7:52 am
Sebelius.] [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Sebelius. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:05 am
Back to the update, on remand to the district court, judgment was entered in accordance with the appellate opinion and the plaintiffs filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to § 2412 of the EAJA, permitting the court discretion to award fees where the government acted "in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:08 am
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
This opinion by Judge Fisher contains exactly the right tone and content. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:26 am
Sebelius (2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:17 am
Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General of Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:45 am
The Sherley v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
Sebelius were injured by the mandate, then the Private Plaintiffs in Texas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:06 am
Sebelius: the ACA can no longer be read to offer a choice between buying insurance and paying a penalty” and “Instant Analysis of Texas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Sebelius. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
SEBELIUS. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Back in September, we reported on the Sixth Circuit’s high-profile decision in Autocam Corp., et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
Back in September, we reported on the Sixth Circuit’s high-profile decision in Autocam Corp., et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
Sebelius, No. 11-40631. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm
Sebelius, but they don't in California v. [read post]
