Search for: "Bahr v. Bahr" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
USPTO Sends Interim Guidance Memo To Examiners Regarding Bilski Decision
29 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Bahr, Acting Associate Commissioner For Patent Examination Policy SUBJECT:     Supreme Court Decision in Bilski v. [read post]
Patent Baristas - http://www.patentbaristas.com
PTAB gives reprimand on 101 in CHIABRERA
1 Apr 2013, 8:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Bahr, Acting Assoc. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
USPTO Sends Bilski Memo to Patent Examiners
28 Jun 2010, 10:45 pm by Vincent LoTempio
Kappos Decision Bilski vs Kappos Legal community weighs in on Bilski v. [read post]
LoTempio Law Blog - http://www.lotempiolaw.com/
Supreme Court Rules That Juries - Not Judges - Must Determine Facts Supporting Large Criminal Fines
20 Jul 2012, 9:36 am by Lisa Baird
In Southern Union Co. v. [read post]
Life Sciences Legal Update - http://www.lifescienceslegalupdate.com/
[Eugene Volokh] North Dakota Constitution Likely Secures a Right to Life- and Health-Preserving Abortions
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A motion for reconsideration is vested in the sound discretion of the court and should be granted only when the trial judge concludes the initial decision was based on a palpably incorrect or irrational basis, or the judge did not consider or failed to ap
8 Oct 2011, 10:28 am by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Reconsideration is reserved for cases that fall into a narrow corridor in which the court has expressed its decision based upon a palpably incorrect or irrational basis or it is obvious that the court either did not consider, or failed to appreciate the s
7 Mar 2011, 9:03 am by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A motion for reconsideration
8 Dec 2011, 3:02 pm by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
PME Québécoises en Floride
21 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by admin
Grand Prix de la Formule 1 annulé à Bahreïn, Vent de panique sur la Lybie, etc… mais qu’en est-il du climat économique de la Floride ? [read post]
Blog Droit International par Cabinet d'Avocat Francophone de Floride - http://avocatflorideblog.com
In order to succeed, a litigant on a motion for reconsideration is required to establish that the court expressed its decision on a palpably incorrect or irrational basis, or did not properly consider probative, competent evidence
23 Nov 2011, 9:03 am by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
PTO Reaction to Bilski
7 Jul 2010, 7:43 am by Matt Osenga
 I have no idea where Bahr gets that from the Supreme Court opinion. [read post]
Inventive Step - http://inventivestep.net
The USPTO's Approach to Bilski
8 Jul 2010, 1:16 pm by Visae Patentes
GmbH v. [read post]
Visae Patentes - http://www.visaepatentes.com/
Recent Articles of Interest
15 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
No. 1, 2021).Shuai Chen & Jan van Ours, Mental Health Effects of Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 2021-003/V (2021)).From SSRN (Non-U.S. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Judicial estoppel operates to bar a party to a legal proceeding from arguing a position inconsistent with one previously asserted
17 Jan 2012, 1:45 pm by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Reconsideration is to be utilized narrowly and reserved for situations where the court relied on plainly incorrect reasoning, where the court failed to consider probative, competent evidence, or where there is good reason for the court to reconsider new e
15 Aug 2012, 7:35 am by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Live Blogging from 2011 Sughrue Symposium on IP Law in Akron, Ohio.
21 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Jake Ward
The featured speaker at lunch was Robert Bahr, Associate Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, U.S. [read post]
ANTICIPATETHIS.com - http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com
Materials in North Dakota State Board of Higher Ed v. Jaeger
16 Mar 2012, 8:08 am by Kate Fort
Documents only available through HTM links, not as PDFs. 3:00pm Thursday, March 15, 2012 20120112 North Dakota State Board of Higher Education, Petitioner v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
New USPTO subject matter eligibility (35 USC § 101) examiner guidance and life science examples
9 May 2016, 12:50 pm by Tamsen Barrett (US)
Supreme Court’s rulings in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
Health Law Pulse - http://www.thehealthlawpulse.com/
In a motion for reconsideration, a litigant may bring new, previously unavailable evidence to the court’s attention
9 Mar 2011, 2:25 pm by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Reconsideration may be appropriate when a party has additional information that was unavailable at the time of the original hearing
2 Nov 2010, 10:30 am by PaulKostro
Bahr, 295 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues