Search for: "Bailey v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm by Schachtman
What the Superior Court purport to giveth, the Superior Court taketh away. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:56 am by Andrew Vey
A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice touches upon a little discussed area of employment law. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:18 pm by admin
With Dropbox the case filed Superior Court, San Francisco County, No. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Burrus.It is well settled that "the purpose of ... civil trials is to discover the truth" of the claims and defenses presented by the parties, as the court held in Bailey v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Douglas, 2015 ONSC 1104 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded general damages of Can$30,000 to the individual plaintiff in respect of five postings on a bulletin board which were accessed 742 times. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 23 February 2015, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the long running “blogger libel” case of Baglow v Smith 2015 ONSC 1175. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
“To hold otherwise would allow an employer to wield its superior bargaining power to pressure or even compel its employees to underreport their hours, thus neutering the FLSA’s purposeful reallocation of that power,” the court stated in reversing a lower court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of TitleMax (Bailey v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Messier, 2014 QCCS 357 (judgment in French) the Quebec Superior Court awarded Can$5,000 moral damages and Can$5,000 punitive damages in respect of defamatory allegations published on the internet. [read post]