Search for: "Baker v. Coxe"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2009, 9:44 am
For publication opinions today (4): In Larry Cox and Tube City v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:42 pm
Stucky writes for the court and for Ryan and Cox, and Baker writes a dissent for himself and Erdmann. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:52 am
Chief Judge Baker & Senior Judge Cox (2/5) 4. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 7:49 am
The denial of review in Baker v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm
Cox v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 1:13 pm
Tiye Foley, Michael Ritter, and Ryan V. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:00 am
Christopher V. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
Richard Baker of [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:56 pm
CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
Baker, 2016 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 8:56 am
Cox, 2016 U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Rogers Lumber Co., 173 P. 1046, 1048 (Okla. 1918) (“Statutes such as ours are said to have their origin in the common law rule of ‘journeys account’ ”); Baker v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Jim Baker posted the third installment of his series on the counterintelligence implications of artificial intelligence. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am
CCA 37642 Chief Judge Baker dissents in all four and Senior Judge Effron dissents in one. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
In Baker v Irondequoit CSD, 70 NY2d 314, the Court of Appeals held that a union's duty to process a former employee's grievance, under some circumstances, survives the employee's separation.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_07272.htm [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:32 pm
In this context, CAAF’s 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
We had a post from Oliver Cox on the judgment. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
