Search for: "Baker v. State of Louisiana*"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Helping Family Voices address these challenges are partners at the state Title V/CSHCN agency, the Children's Hospital, Agenda for Children, MCH, the UAP, and the Academy of Pediatrics. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:56 pm
Sec. 1630.2(h)(1) (BNSF Railway Co v Feit, July 6, 2012, Baker, B). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
Muller v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Baker, 554 U. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 9:01 am
Georgia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
Additional commentary comes from Ashley Baker at the Committee for Justice blog. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:31 pm
On the website, you can find classic cases like Baker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:25 am
” The NFIB blog urges the court to review Jarreau v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Baker, 954 F.3d 351, 371 (1st Cir. 2020) (“The United States' system of representative democracy [includes] ... the Electoral College and ... [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:41 pm
Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008). [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 6:53 am
According to the 2008 case Exxon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
According to DOJ’s press release: Medical doctor Dahlia V. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment allows a state to require a Christian baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm
It remains one of only three decisions in federal trial courts to uphold a ban, but the judges in the other two did not address the issue directly, finding that they had no authority to consider the issue because they were bound by a one-line Supreme Court decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
See, e.g., AARP v. [read post]
