Search for: "Baker v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am by admin
The Roverano plaintiff appealed from the Superior Court’s straightforward application of a remedial statute. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 1:10 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
-v- D.B., 116 Ohio St 3rd 363 (2007), discussed but declined to follow the Michigan Court of Appeal's Doe case. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:35 am by Kate Howard
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County 16-466 Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Affirming this decision on appeal, the Superior Court found the clause to be clear and unambiguous and summarily rejected the plaintiffs' public policy arguments.Offsetting BenefitsThe Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:46 am by Moseley Collins
Superior Court (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 72, the court held that plaintiff's evidence was sufficient to create a triable question of fact as to whether [defendant's] conduct with respect to [plaintiff]'s pressure sores constituted a reckless failure to provide medical care for her physical health needs. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:27 am by John Lewis
Posted by John LewisIn the wake of the Supreme Court’s April 27th decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Tellingly, the Supreme Court issued its decision upholding President Donald Trump’s travel ban, Trump v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by David J. DePaolo
The Appellate Division of the Board affirmed, and McRae then sought judicial review in superior court, which likewise upheld the decision of the ALJ.McRae appealed from the judgment of the superior court and argued that the Act does not compel her to authorize her treating physician to communicate ex parte with representatives of her employer, and that her right to medical privacy is protected by both Georgia law and the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance… [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:59 pm by Schachtman
David Dennison) for declaratory relief, in California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, after the TRO was entered. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 837, and my 8/5/20 and 8/26/20 posts on it can be found here and here. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]