Search for: "Baker v. USA" Results 101 - 120 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Nichols, are co-owners of Prime Mortgage USA, INC. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
” Briefly: PrawfsBlawg’s Thomas Baker describes the Justices’ secret Cold War bunker. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
" [USA Today] Sponsored Topics: San Diego - St. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:28 am by Walter Olson
” [WKMG Orlando] Retired Justice John Paul Stevens isn’t buying the “Thomas should recuse” meme [USA Today via Legal Ethics Forum] Not COPPA-cetic: among other unintended consequences, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has encouraged parents to help kids to falsify ages online [Danah Boyd via Jim Harper, Suderman, Reason, Stewart Baker, earlier] Lawmaking from the bench: Maryland high court strikes down law limiting landlords’… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Veden; Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: Dissonant Voices, Democratice Choices: The Rhetoric of Apportionment in Baker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that in one of the summary reversals, Dunn v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
(Patent Docs) Baytril / Cipro / Ciprodex / Fludara / Legend / Proleukin - US: District Court W D Tennessee: False marking complaint: Baker v Bayer Aktiengescellschaft Corp. et al. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
"The plaintiff failed to allege any facts from which malice could be inferred and [her] conclusory allegations of malice were insufficient to overcome the privilege" (Red Cap Valet v Hotel Nikko [USA], 273 AD2d 289, 290; see Rohrlich v Consolidated Bus Tr., Inc., 15 AD3d at 562; Serratore v American Port Servs., 293 AD2d 464; Freidman v Ergin, 110 AD2d 620, affd 66 NY2d 645; see also Breytman v Olinville Realty, LLC, 54 AD3d 703, 704;… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
At the end of 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Root, Roger Parloff of Fortune, Katharine Baker at the IIT Chicago-Kent Faculty Blog, and the Committee for Justice at its blog. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
 In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]