Search for: "Bakke v. Regents of University of California" Results 21 - 40 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2021, 6:55 am by David Oscar Markus
Supreme Court decision that outlaws “reverse discrimination,” Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
The Supreme Court’s precedents on affirmative action dated back to 1978, when a divided Court came to a mixed decision in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
ICYMI: Georgetown Law's Neal Katyal and Randy Barnett on Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm by Theodore Shaw
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s announced retirement came one day short of the 40th anniversary of Board of Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
 Since Justice Lewis Powell’s pathmarking 1978 opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
 For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 11:22 am by Michael DelSignore
However, the Supreme Court did strike down the use of racial quotas in college admissions in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974), Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am by jonathanturley
For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Gail Heriot
Regents of the University of California (1976), which (unlike the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by Alexandra Seymour
In deciding the Harvard and UNC cases, the Supreme Court will decide whether to overturn its decision in Regents of University of California v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
For the 2d panel, the Section on Constitutional Law welcomes proposals for a paper, to be posted on the AALS website and published in the Loyola Law Review, that reflects on "the legacy of" Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
One problem, the Court said, was that of proof of remedial fit: It is sheer speculation how many minority firms there would be in Richmond absent past societal discrimination, just as it was sheer speculation how many minority medical students would have been admitted to the medical school at Davis [in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]