Search for: "Ball v. Stark"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
Best, Michelle Ball Education Law Attorney LA [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
At the heart of McDaniel v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
In today’s case (Robinson v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:51 am
Surely there should be a better solution than these two stark alternatives. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:30 am
See Patch v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
They are just calling balls and strikes. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, has pulled together of list of 12 takeaways for corporate officials from the SEC’s guidance. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm
– Boston lawyer Seth Jaffe of Foley Hoag on the firm’s blog, Law & The Environment Medical Malpractice Payments Were At Their Lowest in Over 20 Years – New Jersey lawyer David Cohen of Stark & Stark on the firm’s Nursing Home Law Blog Top 5 Takeaways from MIE’s Annual National Fundraising Conference – Probono.net Development Associate Karin Romans on their blog, Connecting Justice Communities Sixth Circuit Holds Kentucky Bar… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 3:11 am
It provides another stark reminder of the importance of the way in which experts’ reports are prepared in patent litigation in England. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 4:28 pm
Surely there should be a better solution than these two stark alternatives. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Therefore, the case was removable and Flores' motion to remand is DENIED.'" Id. at *47.You couldn't ask for a more stark contrast of results -- or of judicial philosophies.Although our crystal ball is cloudy, we predict that the view reading statutory language literally will ultimately prevail. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:55 am
The argument yesterday in Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
But officials warn tar balls could start hitting area beaches by tomorrow. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 5:09 am
Is there anything this company won't say to take your eye off the ball? [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:37 pm
See Rawls v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm
In Vance v Ball State University, the 5-4 majority endorsed a narrow definition of the meaning of “supervisor” for purposes of determining employer liability under Title VII. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
To that list he now adds his own judicial biography of the man who successfully argued Brown v. [read post]
