Search for: "Bar's Products Inc v. Bars Products International Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm
On May 30, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
Takeaway: A patentee's trademark application was used, unsuccessfully, by the accused infringer as evidence of an on-sale bar. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:46 pm
Leader Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 5:14 pm
VirnetX has asked the ITC to institute an investigation into Apple's allegedly infringing imports and ultimately issue an exclusion order to bar importation of those Apple products. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:28 pm
This en banc CAFC decision is about Hospira's appeal of thedistrict court's ruling that the on-sale bar was NOT triggered.The CAFC affirmed that the on-sale bar was not triggered.The CAFC began the opinion:Today, we consider the circumstances under which aproduct produced pursuant to the claims of a product-byprocesspatent is “on sale” under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:15 am
Int'l., Inc. v. 3E Trading, LLC, No. 07 C 1111, Slip Op. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:08 am
April 11, 2018 - 11 AM: Noah's, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
Editor's NotesFor further insight, check out the Audio Brief of oral arguments in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Pazzo's Bar and Eatery, Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:02 am
Cancellation No. 92055674 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark PATRIOT RISK & INSURANCE SERVICES & Design (below) for "Insurance agency and brokerage; Insurance services in the nature of loss control management for others," in view of the registered mark PATRIOT RISK SERVICES for "insurance services, namely, insurance agency services, insurance writing and underwriting, insurance brokerage, and insurance consultation services, all in the fields of… [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 5:37 pm
Jiffy Lube International, Inc., et al (January 18, 2007) the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Jiffy Lube and eight other defendants holding that under the doctrine of claim preclusion, an earlier judgment against Jiffy Lube's supplier Bridgewood barred Transclean from bringing a separate infringement action against Bridgewood's customers. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:35 am
In Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:08 am
ThermoLife Intern., LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
(emphasis added)Kraft Canada Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Kaloti Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:22 am
But here's where it gets tricky: international commerce. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am
L'anza Research Int'l, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998), the asserted copyrights were unrelated to the value of the product being sold. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Tidewater Marine International, Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:08 am
Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. v. [read post]
