Search for: "Bar's Products Inc v. Bars Products International Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
Second, Judge Guilford's injunction barring the March 15 product launch is an extraordinary ruling given the amount of time that has passed and that a monetary remedy could have been imposed in the form of a royalty or other type of award. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
Inns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 9:48 pm
Otto Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
Co., Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 6:41 am
Dayco Products, LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
” TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Southern Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:58 pm
,Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
Unite Here International Union (National Labor Relations Board) Rincon Mushroom Corporation of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
Unite Here International Union (National Labor Relations Board) Rincon Mushroom Corporation of America v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 7:29 pm
Antidote International Films, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:58 pm
" Here's What The Court Decided: In Berthelot v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:45 am
for athletic apparel on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likelihood of dilution of, the registered mark JUST DO IT for clothing and other goods].February 20, 2020 - 11 AM: Satco Products, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:24 am
Harwood International Incorporated, Cancellation No. 92070634 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark HAPPIEST HOUR for "bar and restaurant services," on the ground of priority and likelihood of confusion with Petitioner's common law mark THE HAPPIEST HOUR for identical services.] [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:26 am
May 4, 2021 - 11 AM: Rodney Green v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
”); MortonInt’l, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
Water, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:33 am
post: Teleflex, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:35 pm
Universal Protection Services (10th Cir., February 16, 2018) (affirming dismissal or Armour's discrimination suit for failure to state a claim: her complaint contained only speculation that Universal's conduct had discriminatory or retaliatory motive)*Nunez v. [read post]
