Search for: "Bar v. Commissioner Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 8:10 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a person appealing the denial of his claim for Social Security disability benefits by a Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) could not rely on new evidence submitted to the SSA's Appeals Council (AC) because the plaintiff challenged only the ALJ and not the later AC decision. [read post]
” Indeed, Commissioner Chopra’s laser focus on mitigating the potential impact of the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in FTC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration subsequently appealed the district court's decision, arguing that the ALJ permissibly discounted appellee's testimony and that the district court substituted its own judgment for that of the ALJ in concluding otherwise. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 11-4096 November 10, 2011 Judge: Ebel Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Plaintiff-Appellant Thomas Richardson appealed a district court's order that affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of his application for Childhood Disability Benefits. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that commonly arise… [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 2:22 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 11, 2011 Farris v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
AstrueCourt: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-56515 October 25, 2011 Judge: Silverman Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Plaintiff appealed the district court's decision affirming the Social Security Administration's (SSA) denial of her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The court held that plaintiffs did exhaust its administrative remedies, but its claim arose out of a misrepresentation and was barred by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. 2671. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"*If the election workers are covered by a Section 218 Agreement with the Social Security Administration (SSA), the terms of the Agreement will determine whether the payments are subject to FICA.** A candidate seeking election to a school board is typically deemed to be seeking office in a “non-partisan” election. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
The Commission devoted significant resources to evaluating its enforcement program in 1972.[9]  In January 1972, Chairman William Casey created a three-member committee to “examine the SEC’s enforcement policy and practices, engage in frequent dialogue with the members of the Commission and with our staff, seek and sift the suggestions of the bar and make recommendations to the Commission for worthwhile improvements to our time-honored ways. [read post]