Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 1 - 20 of 4,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2019, 12:26 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
 Supreme Court decided the case of Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:18 am
In that case, in an opinion which reached a similarly absurd result as the Flores v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
  Or several the of above.The opinion describes Bare's presence in Whippoorwill this way:  "Bare began operating an unlicensed pawnshop out of his home, where he also sold alcohol and drugs. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 9:24 am
LA Times: "Hanes Sues American Apparel over Barely There trademark" [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Mere speculation and bare legal conclusions without any factual support set out in an Article 78 petition are ineffective in rebutting a defendant's motion to dismissEngland v New York City Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Mere speculation and bare legal conclusions without any factual support set out in an Article 78 petition are ineffective in rebutting a defendant's motion to dismissEngland v New York City Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:14 am
Voters approve of the court’s ruling in the Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:13 am by Peter Mahler
The phrase “bare naked assignee” was coined by the preeminent scholar and LLC maven Professor Daniel Kleinberger whose massive oeuvre (not to mention his guest posts on this blog here and here) includes a wonderful article published in 2009 called The Plight of the Bare Naked Assignee (available here on SSRN ). [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:51 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
My thoughts on that led to an article, titled “The Centre Barely Holds: ERISA Preemption After Gobeille v. [read post]