Search for: "Bare v. Bare" Results 61 - 80 of 4,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
  A member might also take guidance from the First Department’s decision in Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 497 [1st Dept 2012]. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 12:20 pm by Giles Peaker
She was a bare licensee of her mother, and a trespasser after her mother’s death. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
The court made a big show of recounting the applicable precedent, but then only barely engaged with the binding precedent. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 12:48 am by Mark Keenan
Charman v Charman [2007]: Illustrated that the ‘nuptial’ nature of a trust could render it alterable by the court in a divorce. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by INFORRM
On 15 June 2023 Fancourt J, handed down judgment  in the case of Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:55 am by George Croner
Those who coined the term “backdoor search” point to a 2019 decision (pp. 68-79), United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
Although the legal history of boycotts in America is complex, boycotts have widely been considered protected speech since NAACP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:54 am by Jocelyn Bosse
 This time, the competing views were laid bare in the recent judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal in Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco v Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated [2023] SGCA 37. [read post]