Search for: "Barnes, et al v. United States, et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court in the landmark case, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Magley, et al (NFP) - "Appellant/Defendant Cadleway Properties, Inc. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:08 pm
Also, if the "second half" of the Bt gene would be deleted, as Barnes et al. suggests, the remaining part would encode a protein of 576 amino acids, which is not toxic. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:45 pm
The practical effect of § 514, according to the Merit Brief for Petitioners Golan, et al., is to provide copyright protection to millions of 20th Century works by foreign artists that have been in the public domain in the United States for years, including such popular works as Peter and The Wolf, by the Russian composer Prokofiev, paintings by Picasso, and films by Alfred Hitchcock. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
SOCAN and Rogers, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Jordan, et al. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
15 May 2007, 11:16 am
United Consulting Engineers, Inc.; United Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
City of Jeffersonville, Indiana; et al. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Wednesday November 10, 2010 (sitting in Amarillo) Genesis Tax Loan Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
United States, and Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am
BUNN, Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:37 am
Mosteller et al., North Carolina Evidentiary Foundations 11-81 n.55 (2nd ed. 2009), the United States Supreme Court subsequently interpreted the parallel federal evidentiary rule and held that such “collateral” statements are inadmissible under this hearsay exception. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm
HSBC Bank, USA, et al. in the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in support of the consumer-appellant, arguing that courts have not correctly interpreted the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) regarding how long a consumer has to rescind a mortgage loan. [read post]
