Search for: "Barnes v. The Railroads" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Railroad Friction Products Corp. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:07 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
– You can also buy my book in print at Amazon.com or as an ebook for the Kindle, the Nook from Barnes and Noble or through Hyperink. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
In that case, the Court held that that railroads can challenge Alabama’s sales and use taxes, which are imposed on railroads but not their primary competitors. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Loos, the court held 7-2 that a railroad’s payment to an employee for time lost from work is taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 City of Newport Beach, 730 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2013) Barnes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features discussions of the recent decisions in BNSF Railroad Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 653, 655 (1948); Barnes v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]