Search for: "Barnesandnoble.com Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2012, 7:16 pm
Essex issued Order No. 33 denying Respondents Barnes and Noble, Inc. and BarnesandNoble.com’s (collectively, “B&N”) motions for summary determination of invalidity and noninfringement in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:48 pm
Essex issued the public version of Order No. 32 (dated January 31, 2012) granting Microsoft’s Motion for Summary Determination, thereby eliminating an affirmative defense of patent misuse raised by Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:25 am
Adrea, LLC ("Adrea") filed a patent infringement action against Barnes & Noble, Inc., barnesandnoble.com llc, and Nook Media LLC (collectively, "B&N"), which alleged that B&N's e-reader Nook infringed U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:31 am
Spring Design, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350-51 (Fed. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 1:05 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:55 am
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan Foxconn Precision Component (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:03 pm
The Respondents are Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York, barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan, Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan, Foxconn Precision Component (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:03 pm
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted-in-part and denied-in-part Complainant Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) motion to declassify the names and roles of particular entities designated as confidential by Respondents Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) and requested a shortened response time. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc.,239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:36 am
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:51 am
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:31 pm
Patent Nos. 5,778,372 (the ‘372 patent), 5,889,522 (the ‘522 patent), 6,339,780 (the ‘780 patent), 6,891,551 (the ‘551 patent), and 6,957,233 (the ‘233 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan Foxconn Precision Component (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:41 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:12 am
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:55 am
Respondents Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com LLC (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) opposed the motion, arguing that (1) subsections (A) and (B) of § 1337(a)(3) are limited to manufacturing activities and neither Microsoft, HTC (maker of Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 domestic product, the HTC Surround) nor Amazon.com make the domestic industry products in the U.S.; (2) Microsoft failed to show that Amazon.com’s investments are… [read post]