Search for: "Barnett v. Care"
Results 1 - 20
of 384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2010, 10:34 pm
Am I reading Randy Barnett correctly to say that the health care bill will be found constitutional unless the Supreme Court decides to act unconstitutionally itself? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 11:04 am
Arguing Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:30 pm
Earlier this month, Randy Barnett wrote a post at the Volokh Conspiracy in which he distinguished the challenge to the individual mandate from Gonzales v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:09 pm
Paul Horwitz, University of Alabama School of Law, has posted A Close Reading of Barnette, in Honor of Vincent Blasi, which appears in the FIU Law Review 13 (2019): 689-728:This article, written for a symposium marking the 75th anniversary of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
In today's Washington Post, Randy Barnett outlines various theories for attacking health care reform if it is passed. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am
Brian's post on the constitutionality of health care legislation inspires my question, but Randy's support for federalism runs deeper than his Washington Post argument against the individual mandate in Obama's health care legislation: He also represented the appellees in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:00 pm
I'm at the American Constitution Society conference in Washington, D.C. today; I'm appearing in a panel with Randy Barnett debating the constitutionality of health care reform.Yesterday Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Trevor Morrison (Columbia), Andrew Pincus (Mayer Brown) and I have filed an amicus brief in Virginia v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 3:43 pm
Sebelius, the inspiration for Barnett’s book, Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:51 pm
(Randy Barnett) My Georgetown colleague and good friend Mike Seidman and I both appeared on the NewsHour tonight to discuss the politicization of any ruling by the Supreme Court invalidating the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:29 am
Following his defeat in Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
The case is Lisa Parr v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:16 am
Throughout the pendency of King v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:39 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:25 am
She writes (bold added by me): Professor Randy Barnett, the intellectual power behind the entire health care challenge, wrote recently that Justice Scalia could break from his previous opinions—freeing him to strike down the Affordable Care Act—“without breaking a sweat. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:41 pm
Barnett, 535 U.S. 391 (2002) overrules precedent set in EEOC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
And I appreciate Barnett's careful and thoughtful engagement with it. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:56 am
One needn't expect more, I suppose, but it's not exactly high-order journalism -- more a skillful use of the ctrl-V function. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:36 am
Randy Barnett argues in the Wall Street Journal that Obamacare goes to far in threatening to withhold money from the states. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Barnett and Solum leave out two major cases from last term, West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
Last week’s oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
