Search for: "Barr v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently ruled in Roth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 1:34 pm
The Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:05 am
In McWeeney v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Barr & Company, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:54 am
Pittas, 2012 Pa Super 96 (Pennsylvania Superior Court, May 7, 2012) [3]23 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am
Barr & Company, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
Coming at the question from a lawyer’s point of view, I look at the private law of nuisance and its superiority as an instrument for environmental regulation in this country. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:10 am
Expert Discovery On Nov. 23, an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an opinion that served to overturn the trial court's decision to allow one party to review written communications sent by the opposing counsel to the opposing party's expert in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Alas, the law firm was unable to accommodate his “superior legal mind. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:54 am
Click here to view the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Sehl v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
PaulkAmicus brief of the Government Accountability ProjectPetitioner's reply Title: Barr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
Barr Labs., Inc., 575 F.3d 1341 (Fed. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am
Sehl v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
They were some of the same arguments resoundingly rejected by a number of courts examining the various justifications for the same-sex marriage prohibitions — most notably the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts and California Federal District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:26 am
Panowicz of Panowicz Law Offices in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, for bringing this decision to my attention.Anyone desiring a copy of this unpublished, non-precedential decision by the Superior Court in Rosiecki may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
In Bayer AG v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania is a coal-mining town along the Susquehanna River, in the Wyoming Valley. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in Joblove v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm
Nevertheless, the plaintiff filed suit in Philadelphia under an argument that the UIM carrier, State Farm, regularly conducted business in that county.The Neff court accepted the tortfeasor defendant's argument that, since the tortfeasor defendant and the UIM carrier were not joint tortfeasors, or were not jointly or severally liable to the plaintiff, then the plaintiff could not compel the tortfeasor defendant to litigate the case in any county where the UIM carrier allegedly could be… [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 7:10 am
In a December 29, 2009 decision in the case of EDB v. [read post]
