Search for: "Barrett v. University of Colorado"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
” In another article, “Stare Decisis and Due Process,” published in the University of Colorado Law Review, Barrett discussed the legal doctrine that generally requires courts to follow existing precedent, even if they might believe that it is wrong. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, Barrett indicated that as a law professor at Notre Dame she was a member of University Faculty for Life, an organization whose website indicates that it “seeks to promote the prolife cause at Notre Dame. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
” In another article, Stare Decisis and Due Process, published in the University of Colorado Law Review, Barrett discussed the concept of stare decisis – a legal doctrine that generally requires courts to follow existing precedent, even if they might believe that it is wrong. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
That background brings me to Justice Barrett's concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Bill Pizzi, emeritus University of Colorado Law SchoolAbortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:30 pm
Presser, the Raoul Berger Professor of Legal History, emeritus, at the Northwestern University School of Law, has been named a 2018-19 Visiting Scholar in Conservative Thought and Policy at the University of Colorado Boulder. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Amy Coney Barrett worked on the briefing for Bush v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
So would the same apply to a 10 university or a college if it opposed same-sex marriage? [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In dissent by himself, Justice Thomas did make originalist arguments but Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Alito did not join him.2021-2022:In Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
If you want a wonderful summary of the inanity of Thomas' opinion, here's a piece for you.In Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
I had thought it that it was a truth, universally acknowledged, that a restriction upon a right may be justified by satisfying a standard of scrutiny. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:29 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
” He observed that Colorado Attorney General Philip Weiser (who was formerly a full-time law professor at the University of Colorado) “might have issued a trigger warning from time to time. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
To Justice Barrett’s question about a social service agency raising a religious objection to interracial marriage, Windham answered by citing to Loving v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
