Search for: "Bartholomew v. District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2022, 9:38 am by Adam Steinman
Today on the Courts Law section of JOTWELL is Christine Bartholomew’s essay, A Post Minimum Contacts World. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 12:00 pm by Howard Wasserman
The new Courts Law essay comes from Christine Bartholomew (Buffalo) reviewing Patrick J. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
We cannot conclude that the district court committed plain error when it admitted evidence regarding the Red Cross website. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
On first glance, after reading today's opinion by Division Six of the Second District, it seemed like a run-of-the-mill split in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:30 am by Christine Bartholomew
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court and “Corporate Tag Jurisdiction” in the Pennoyer Era, 72 Case W. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am by MBettman
On May 8, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm by Eric
The district court held in favor of Von Drehle on the trademark infringement and unfair competition claims. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 8:57 am by Eric Goldman
Google * YouTube Defeats Defamation Claim in ‘Remove-and-Relocate’ Case–Bartholomew v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 pm
  The appeals court found the district court to have grossly abused its discretion. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc., Aaron Black and William FangCase number: 15-cv-02304 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: March 27, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 1, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-50 In the Matter of BlackRock Advisors, LLC and Bartholomew A. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
Bartholomew County Department of Child Services Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.N.; Dawn Nowak v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am by MBettman
Allen appealed to the Tenth District Court of Appeals, challenging only the restitution order. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Byrne’s affidavit primarily related to the nature of his invention, the scope of the Bartholomew patent, and the novel features of his invention that were independent of the “planar” limitation.Of some interest as to what the district court did:Initially, the district court granted WHE’s motion to strike Kiesel’s affidavit, sua sponte deciding that Kiesel was “not qualified to provide expert testimony on the issue of… [read post]