Search for: "Bass v. Bass"
Results 1 - 20
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 12:21 pm
There's an important new opinion, Bass v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Autopsy photograph The appellant, Quinton Bass, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City by a jury, presided over by Judge Timothy J. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am
The Full Court has found: claims 1 and 5 of Australian Innovation Patent No 2006100980, in the name of Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd (‘SI’) (the ‘first innovation patent’) to be infringed by Richard Bass Pty Ltd (‘Bass’); and all claims of Australian Innovation Patent No 2008100126 to be valid (and also infringed by Bass). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:09 am
On appeal before the Full Federal Court in Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83, the court reversed Justice Spender (see Fishy Business — Bass Baked by ‘Stunning’ Appeal). [read post]
27 May 2014, 11:44 am
Bass v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Case citation: Bass v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:47 am
Bass v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:09 pm
In Bass v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:37 pm
Susan Decker of Bloomberg wrote of Kyle Bass's loss at PTAB on Acorda/Ampyra:The U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 10:55 am
The EEOC v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:27 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:17 pm
This week, in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:05 am
In Bass v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:27 pm
Bass Pro v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
The Sixth Circuit agreed this week to publish United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
See for example Hickman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
Case: Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 83ConstructionThe fish stunning machine covered by the patents had a fish stunning device, a fish guide and a trigger. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
"Bass has to hope the current justices don't share that view today, when the Court takes up what he thinks could be the most important patent decision in 40 years.Now a partner in the D.C. firm Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, Bass is part of the legal team that will be defending a disputed patent in the case of KSR International v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:32 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was denied in part and granted in part (EEOC v Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, March 4, 2014, Ellison, K). [read post]
