Search for: "Bass v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2010, 8:20 am
Although most of the couple’s income had been derived from the husband’s withholdings, the bankruptcy court judge ruled that the husband and wife were each entitled to 50% of the tax refund, based on the case of Bass v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:57 pm
A Ninth Circuit decision supports the CBP’s position, holding that “reasonable suspicion is not needed for customs officials to search a laptop or other electric device at the international border” (United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:10 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
See Bass Pro Trademarks v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
Sir Robin concluded his speech by criticizing the L'Oreal v Bellure decision (the AmeriKat agrees) and that this was an unfortunate development in trade mark law in Europe. [read post]
3 May 2020, 12:01 pm
The Supreme Court of Tennessee has stated, in Bass v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:55 am
While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has declared that the term “sex” in Title VII includes transgender protection, that interpretation hasn’t been vetted extensively by the courts and may not be resolved until United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Wolff; Donald V. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
(citing Bass v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am
Applying Morrison, Second Circuit Affirms UBS Credit Crisis Securities Suit Dismissal As Kevin LaCroix explains in his blog, after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Code § 3344) and common law (White v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Code § 3344) and common law (White v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:19 am
For example, the court pointed to "Julian v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
