Search for: "Bass v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
Breaking News: PTAB declines Bass hedge fund IPR challenges in Ampyra disputeThe Coalition for Affordable Drugs (brain child of hedge-fund manager Kyle Bass) experiences disappointment as the USPTO opts not to review a couple of big-value pharma patents. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
Inter partes review is a provision of the American Invents Act (AIA) to challenge the validity of a patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.link: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ptab-invalidates-lucerne-biosciences-813-patent-for-the-treatment-of-binge-eating-disorder-with-lisdexamfetamine-dimesylate-300098752.htmlNote also: … [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
The case is called Williams v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
Keep Our Mountains Quiet v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
The Sixth Circuit agreed this week to publish United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
” Denise Bass v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 9:48 am
Panel V. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:41 am
Swirsky v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:20 pm
V, § 15, Fla. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
He quoted Judge Newman of the Second Circuit, who stated that factual copying and actionable copying are not coextensive concepts. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Agreeing with Bass v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Finally, the EEOC erroneously relied on another case involving CHSI - Bass v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
As we discussed here, that suit was dismissed on August 20, 2014 in State of Texas v. [read post]
