Search for: "Bates v. Bates" Results 1 - 20 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there was an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 On the same day, judgment was handed down in De Azavedo Camacho v OCS Group UK Ltd [2024] EWHC 1164 (KB) by Linden J. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
 We note that the Helsinki decision is under appeal (UPC CoA_500/2023) and no doubt court users wait with bated breath to see the outcome. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by Frank Cranmer
Therefore, considering the judgment Sedley LJ in Redmond-Bate v DPP and the reforms to the Public Order Act 1986 ss 4A – 5 threshold, the law has established a clear framework. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:33 am by Tessa Shepperson
If you did actually have the gas safety certificate at that time but just forgot to serve it, then the Court of Appeal decision in the case of Trecarrel House ltd v Roucefield provides that you will be able to serve your section 21 notice. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:42 am by Brian Inkster
This past week the country (UK) has been collectively transfixed, outraged and disillusioned by Mr Bates v The Post Office on ITV. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:40 am by Frank Cranmer
  Quick links Stephanie Biden et al: Bates Wells: Faith-based Organisations 2023 Update. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:44 am by Eve Ross
Now Online Thanks to the digitization work of law librarians Lillian Bates, Dan Brackmann, and Michael Mounter, the Gavel Raps are now freely available online. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Stephanie Biden et al, Bates Wells: Faith-based Organisations 2023 Update: a helpful overview – especially the roundup of cases. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]