Search for: "Baum v. Baum" Results 81 - 100 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
The next day, on December 10, 2011, at the request of Dean of Students David Baum, the LawClosed list was disabled. . . .Enjaian v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am by Amy Howe
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Matthew Streb
The Supreme Court’s decision in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
Although the rep alleged that the company had actual knowledge of the sales’ director’s incompetence as a supervisor, incompetence did not rise to the level of “criminal or tortious propensities,” concluded the Northern District of Ohio (Baum v Intertek Testing Services). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Proia, Freeing the Prop 8 Tape: Perry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
Well, we all missed a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision -- quite a big one and an unusual one too -- Case C‑661/11, Martin Y Paz Diffusion SA v David Depuydt, Fabriek van Maroquinerie Gauquie NV, a ruling of the Third Chamber of Europe's favourite court that dates all the way back to 19 September. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:59 am by Bill Marler
Baum, 482 F.2d 1325 (2nd Cir. 1973). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
  The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix, where Judges James Marlar, George Nielsen, Redfield Baum, Sarah Sharer Curley, Charles Case II, Eileen Hollowell, and Randolph Haines preside. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bells v Foster 2011 NY Slip Op 03195 Decided on April 19, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department say: "Here, the plaintiff failed to establish her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law because she failed to demonstrate that any negligence on the defendant's part in failing to timely cancel the contract of sale on her behalf was the sole proximate cause of her damages (see Snolis v Clare, 81 AD3d 923; see also Selletti v Liotti, 22 AD3d 739;… [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]