Search for: "Baum v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Defendants have asserted a counterclaim for account stated. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Baum v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:26 am
Called the Baumes Law, after its principal author and advocate New York Senator Caleb Baumes, the law remains one of the harshest habitual offender laws ever passed in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am
In a more rational world, perhaps a United States congresswoman would not call upon colleges to violate the Constitution, to act lawlessly for the sake of woman at the expense of men. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 5:24 am
One such right would be cross-examination, as held in Doe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Maryland v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 pm
United States (2015), the Supreme Court declared the "residual clause" of the Armed Career Criminal Act void for vagueness. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:03 am
Workers’ rights and the Supreme Court — Joseph Seiner, The Supreme Court’s New Workplace: Procedural Rulings and Substantive Worker Rights in the United States (Cambridge University Press 2017): Seiner argues that the Supreme Court has systematically eroded the rights of minority workers through subtle changes in procedural law. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
United States, in which the Court recently heard reargument on whether the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
Baum’s primary interest is in courts in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
Still, sometimes, as in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
