Search for: "Baxter v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 11:03 am by David Lat
Thomsen, Linda Chatman Thomsen, Linda Thomsen, Marketing, Mitchell Zuklie, Musical Chairs, Orrick, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Partner Issues, Paul Hastings, Peter Krakaur, Peter Lattman, Ralph Baxter, Reid Horovitz, Sara Randazzo, Shearman & Sterling, Thomas J. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
The facts of Peter Schmidt, about a winding up petition, and JK v MK, about a consensual divorce, were very different from those in the present case. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Alisa Lazear
Samuel Beswick is an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia Peter A. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
If Baxter’s expert invoked the IARC working group’s classification for complete exoneration of DEHP, then Greenland’s point is fair enough. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US: AIPLA urges Federal Circuit not to proscribe patents for biomedical diagnostic tools: Prometheus v Mayo (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Lovenox (Enoxaparin) – US: Aventis files for certiorari: challenging Federal Circuit’s low standard for intent to deceive in… [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Inventive Step) CAFC to hear inequitable conduct case en banc: Theresense, Inc v Becton Dickinson and Co (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas holds ResQNet does not require admission of license agreements arising out of litigation: Fenner v HP (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court S D Texas: False marking fine set at point above gross… [read post]