Search for: "Baxter v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2008, 2:15 am
The United States Supreme Court, in the little known 1975 case of US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
Haemonetics v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 1:00 pm
"In contrast, on October 26, 2017, a California appellate court handed down its decision in Baxter v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Jan. 2, 2019) (condition that respondent file a petition on behalf of petitioner for immigration to the United States after respondent’s move to the United States was not met); Chumachenko v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am
Case date: 11 May 2021 Case number: No. 19-1077 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
After the court refused the motion, the plaintiff moved to certify a proposed class of "[a]ll persons residing in the United States who hold a United States copyright interest in one or more books reproduced by Google. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
” (8) Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio found that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
(See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
" Justice Marvin Baxter dissented, stating that the question of whether Salas was ineligible under federal immigration law to be employed in the United States was an issue that had yet to be decided. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:12 am
Berenguela-Alvarado later gave EICB permission to travel to the United States a second time. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 3:47 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
You get more 5-4 decisions in the United States Supreme Court than 4-3 decisions in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:42 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:35 pm
In Bowen v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
’s passage to the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am
Kraweloc’s co-counsel, Michael Rubin, responded that the decision would have retroactive effect, pursuant to controlling United States Supreme Court authority. [read post]
