Search for: "Bayer Pharma AG"
Results 21 - 40
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
***** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* Bayer feels the pain: branded Naproxen can't invoke the territoriality principleKatfriend Marty Schwimmer reports on Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, 1:14-cv-00847-GBL (EDVA Feb. 6, 2015), a recent US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruling that deals with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in the US as it applies to Bayer’s trade mark ‘FLANAX’. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 3:08 am
Bayer CropScience AG (agribusiness, 42 patents)2. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Bayer Corp., U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
The German Schering AG was Berlex, Inc. in North America while Schering-Plough was Essex Pharma GmbH in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 11:59 pm
However, the court has found that Regeneron has engaged in a ‘common design’ with pharmaceutical company Bayer Pharma AG, and its Australian subsidiary Bayer Australia Limited, to undertake actions in Australia that would, on the face of it, infringe the patent. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:28 am
Warner Chilcott Company LLC et al. 1:12-cv-01032; filed August 13, 2012 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH; Bayer Pharma AG • Defendants: Warner Chilcott Co. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:21 am
The Chinese move comes within months of a similar move by India to effectively end the monopoly on an expensive cancer drug made by Bayer AG by issuing its first so-called “compulsory license”. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
In Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:12 pm
By Andrew Williams -- In a second case involving the Hatch-Waxman regulatory scheme decided by the Federal Circuit on Monday, the Court held in Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
VEGF Trap Eye Floyd J’s decision was in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG v Genentech Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:43 pm
Bayer CropScience AG et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:55 am
Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Schering Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235; [2012] WLR (D) 66 “On an application for the revocation of a registered patent on the ground of obviousness it was sufficient for the judge hearing the case to take an objective view whether a skilled formulator would take the trouble to obtain copies of papers published by inventors or review their contents to ascertain whether the patent in question related to an invention which was novel. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:07 am
Supreme Court W (Algeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 (7 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235 (07 March 2012) Miah & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261 (07 March 2012) Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260 (07 March 2012) Zieleniewski v Scheyd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 247 (06 March 2012)… [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:47 pm
This clever argument, advanced by Simon Thorley QC for the appellant in Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235, nicely illustrates the theoretical point that meaning turns on context, not just on the text, and it was accepted by both the Court of Appeal [51], and by Floyd J at first instance [2011] EWHC 583 (Pat), [76]. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
” Depending on who you ask, Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
